Estate Planning
Estate planning helps you minimize estate taxes
and distribute your assets according to your wishes. While most
people will need the help of professionals, we’ve included
several articles on the topic:
• Estate Planning
under the 2001 Tax Act
• Making Lifetime Gifts
• Do You Still Need Life Insurance for
Estate Purposes?
• Distributing Money to Your Children
• Integrating an Inheritance
If you have any questions or would
like to discuss your estate planning situation in more detail,
please contact us at
248-858-2723.
Estate Planning under
the 2001 Tax Act
The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation
Act of 2001 has made the estate planning process more complicated.
The estate tax is scheduled to phase out gradually from 2002 to
2009, be repealed in 2010, and then reinstated in 2011 based on
2001 tax laws. That, of course, assumes that there will be no further
tax legislation during this time. Before reviewing how this may
impact your estate planning strategies, you should understand the
major changes:
The estate tax phase-out will occur
as follows:
| |
Exemption Amount |
Highest Tax Rate |
| |
|
2002 |
$1,000,000 |
50% |
2003 |
1,000,000 |
49 |
2004 |
1,500,000 |
48 |
2005 |
1,500,000 |
47 |
2006 |
2,000,000 |
46 |
2007 |
2,000,000 |
45 |
2008 |
2,000,000 |
45 |
2009 |
3,500,000 |
45 |
2010 |
N/A |
Repealed |
When the estate tax is repealed, the
provision allowing inherited assets to receive a step-up in basis
to market value at the decedent’s date of death will also
be repealed. Inherited property will then generally have a basis
equal to the lesser of the decedent’s adjusted basis or the
property’s fair market value at the decedent’s date
of death, with three exceptions: 1) $1,300,000 of basis can be added
to assets. 2) Unused capital losses, net operating losses, and certain
built-in losses can increase this cap. 3) An additional $3,000,000
of basis can be added to assets inherited by a surviving spouse.
The lifetime gift exemption increased from $675,000
in 2001 to $1,000,000 in 2002 and will remain at that amount. The
maximum gift tax rate will equal the maximum estate tax rate through
2009 and after that will equal the maximum individual income tax
rate.
The generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption
will increase from $1,100,000 in 2002 (adjusted for inflation in
2003) to $1,500,000 in 2004 and then will follow the estate tax
exemption schedule. The GST tax will also be repealed in 2010 and
reinstated in 2011. The GST tax rate will equal the maximum estate
tax rate.
Your estate planning strategies should now encompass
the possibility that you may die during three periods — the
phase-out period, the year of estate tax repeal, and after reinstatement
in 2011. What impact will all of these changes have on your estate
planning strategies? Consider the following tips when reviewing
your estate plan:
• Examine your current
estate planning documents carefully. Many documents indicate
that trusts should be funded with assets equal to the unified credit
applicable exclusion amount or GST tax exemption amount. With the
exemption amount increasing significantly between 2002 and 2009,
this may result in too large a percentage of your estate going into
trusts. The higher exemption amounts may leave more than you intended
to your grandchildren or may place so much in a credit shelter or
other trust that your spouse receives very little of your estate
outright. Be sure to examine your estate planning documents every
couple of years during this transition period.
• Remember that there
are also non-estate-tax reasons for planning your estate.
Even if the increases in exemption amounts mean that your estate
won’t be subject to federal estate taxes, there are still
reasons to plan your estate. You probably still need a will to provide
for the distribution of your estate and to name guardians for minor
children. You should also consider a durable power of attorney,
which designates someone to control your financial affairs if you
become incapacitated, and a health care proxy, which delegates health
care decisions to another person when you are unable to make these
decisions.
• Watch for any changes
to your state’s estate taxes. The state death tax
credit allowed against the federal estate tax will be reduced by
25% in 2002, 50% in 2003, 75% in 2004, and completely repealed in
2005. It will be replaced with a deduction for death taxes actually
paid. Many states have tied their estate taxes to this federal estate
tax credit, so that total estate taxes were not increased for any
amounts paid to states. With that credit being phased out and repealed,
current formulas may result in the payment of more estate taxes
or states may increase their estate tax rates to make up for the
lost revenue. Make sure to watch for state changes, which could
have a significant impact on your estate.
• Review documents dealing
with your potential incapacity. You may want to give family
members more flexibility in determining what life support measures
to use. While it may sound morbid, family members of individuals
with large estates may have differing views about how to handle
a serious illness during the 2009 to 2011 period.
• Consider allocating
specific assets to heirs. Due to the three exceptions for
adding basis to assets in 2010, you may want to specifically allocate
assets with low basis to your spouse and assets with a higher basis
to other heirs.
• Continue an annual
gifting program, since it does not result in the payment of gift
taxes. (See the article “Making Lifetime Gifts”
for more details.)
• Be cautious of undoing
any estate planning strategies already in place. If these
strategies were viable for your estate before the new tax act, they
probably are still viable. Those strategies could include life insurance
purchased to pay estate taxes or trusts established for estate planning
purposes.
• Plan for potential
capital gains taxes. With the loss of the step-up in basis
in 2010, heirs of larger estates may find that their tax burden
has shifted from an estate tax burden to a capital gains tax burden.
You may want to make provisions to help your heirs pay those taxes.
• Keep records to comply
with the new carryover basis rules. Heirs may have difficulty
calculating the original basis of assets that have been owned for
years or even decades. If the step-up in basis is repealed, you
can help your heirs by keeping detailed records for basis calculations.
Instead of eliminating the need for estate planning,
the eventual repeal of the estate tax has made estate planning more
complicated.
Making Lifetime Gifts
Since estate taxes are scheduled to be phased
out gradually and then reinstated in 2011, you may still want to
make gifts during your lifetime to reduce your taxable estate. Some
tips to consider include:
• Use your annual gift
tax exclusion amount. In 2002, you can gift up to $11,000
($22,000 if the gift is split with your spouse) to any individual
free of gift taxes. This amount is adjusted annually for inflation,
in $1,000 increments. You can make these gifts to any number of
individuals. Any future appreciation or income generated on those
gifts is also removed from your estate.
• Pay medical and education
expenses for your heirs. Certain amounts paid directly
to institutions for these expenses can be made gift-tax free.
• Consider using your
lifetime gift exclusion. This exclusion increased to $1,000,000
in 2002 and is in addition to the amount you can gift annually without
paying gift taxes. Thus, those with estates large enough to be subject
to estate taxes may consider using this exclusion to remove assets
from their taxable estate.
• Look into ways to maximize
the benefit of your exclusion amounts. For instance, individuals
who transfer noncontrolling interests in businesses, farms, real
estate, and other assets during their lifetime may be able to assign
a minority interest discount to the gift’s value. Gifting
assets to certain types of trusts, such as qualified personal residence
trusts and grantor retained annuity trusts, allows you to place
an asset in trust now, use the asset for a period of time, and thus
place a lower value on the gift.
• Avoid making taxable
gifts to heirs for now. The scheduled phase-out and repeal
of the estate tax means that more estates will be able to minimize
the payment of estate taxes.
• Gift property that
has the potential to increase in value, but has not already done
so. A lifetime gift’s tax basis remains your original
basis plus any gift tax paid. Thus, if you gift an asset with a
low basis, your heirs could owe significant capital gains tax when
the asset is sold.
• Make charitable contributions
during your lifetime. Charitable contributions made after
death are free of estate taxes. With the future of the estate tax
uncertain, you may want to make charitable contributions during
your life. Those contributions still lower your taxable estate and
will also allow you to receive an income tax deduction for the contributions.
• Keep your own needs
in mind. While gifting can be a valuable estate planning
strategy, you don’t want to gift so much of your estate that
you have difficulty making ends meet later in life.
Do You Still Need Life
Insurance for Estate Purposes?
One of the more popular reasons to own life
insurance is to use the proceeds to help fund estate taxes. If the
policy is properly structured, the proceeds will not be included
in your taxable estate and your beneficiaries will not have to pay
federal income or gift taxes. However, with the eventual repeal
of the estate tax in 2010, you may wonder if there is still a need
for life insurance for estate purposes.
Since the estate tax won’t be repealed
until 2010, your estate plan should consider strategies to deal
with estate taxes in the event you die before then. Thus, life insurance
may be an appropriate estate planning strategy until at least 2010.
Even after that, however, there is no certainty that the estate
tax repeal will be permanent. Due to the sunset provisions of the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, the estate
tax will be reinstated in 2011, based on 2001 tax laws, unless further
legislation is enacted.
Even if the estate tax repeal is permanent,
there are still situations where the use of life insurance will
be an appropriate estate planning strategy. Some of those situations
include:
• To provide liquidity
to an estate. If your estate consists primarily of illiquid
assets, such as real estate or a business, you may want to use insurance
so your family won’t be forced to sell or mortgage assets.
• To equalize inheritances.
Perhaps your primary asset is a family business, which is run by
one of your children. You may want to leave the business to that
child, but need additional funds to equalize the inheritance for
your other children. Insurance proceeds can be used for that purpose.
• To transfer wealth
to heirs. Even if the estate tax is permanently repealed,
life insurance proceeds still retain their income tax advantage
— proceeds are paid to beneficiaries free of federal income
taxes. Thus, life insurance may still be an appropriate way to increase
your bequest to your heirs.
• To leave a large charitable
contribution. You may want to leave a large charitable
contribution to a charity without depleting the assets left to your
heirs. To do this, you could designate the charity as beneficiary
of a life insurance policy.
• To help heirs fund
future tax liabilities. After the estate tax is repealed,
inherited assets will no longer receive a step up in basis to the
market value at the date of the decedent’s death. Instead,
inherited property will generally have a basis equal to the lesser
of the decedent’s adjusted basis or the property’s fair
market value at the date of the decedent’s death. To that
basis, three items can be added: 1) $1,300,000 of basis; 2) unused
capital losses, net operating losses, and certain built-in losses;
and 3) an additional $3,000,000 of basis to assets transferred to
a surviving spouse. If you leave substantial assets with low basis
to your heirs, they may face significant future tax liabilities.
You may want to help them with those tax liabilities through the
use of life insurance.
Distributing Money
to Your Children
Turning wealth over to children or grandchildren
can raise some troubling issues. While a large inheritance can alleviate
financial concerns for your heirs, you probably don’t want
that inheritance to remove the incentive to work hard or to lead
a productive life. You also don’t want your heirs to spend
the money irresponsibly, obtaining no long-term benefits from the
inheritance.
To help you assess how your heirs would handle
an inheritance, consider making lifetime gifts to them. Every year
you can make gifts, up to $11,000 in 2002 ($22,000 if you split
the gift with your spouse), to any individual tax free. You can
then assess how well they handle these gifts. Do they waste the
money on extravagant purchases or set it aside in savings? Are they
appreciative of the gifts or feel it is their right to receive the
gifts? Their actions can help you decide whether you need to control
the distribution of their inheritance.
If you want to control distributions, you can
set up a trust, attaching conditions to those distributions. Those
conditions could include:
• Spreading the income
over many years or decades. You don’t have to turn
your entire estate over to your children when they turn 21. You
may want to distribute pre-determined percentages of your estate
when your children reach certain ages. Or you can distribute only
income from the trust until your children reach a certain age, then
distribute the remaining assets.
• Making distributions
contingent on achieving certain goals. You can designate
that distributions be made when your child finishes college, gets
a job, or has children. You can also base distributions on how much
income your child earns. For instance, you can allow the child to
take 50¢ from the trust for every $1 he/she earns. Or you may
wish to supplement the incomes of heirs who choose careers in government,
educational institutions, or charitable organizations. These types
of distributions can help encourage behavior you feel is important.
• Designating some funds
for health problems, education funding, or emergencies. That
way, a child who is confronted with serious health problems or other
emergencies will have financial resources to help deal with these
problems. You can allow your trustee to decide when the funds should
be distributed.
You can’t totally control how your heirs
spend their inheritance, but you can control when and how they receive
it. By doing so, hopefully you can help teach them how to handle
their inheritance responsibly.
Integrating an Inheritance
When you receive investments as part of an inheritance,
you must integrate them into your overall portfolio. In many cases,
that will require changes to your portfolio. Consider the following:
• Review each inherited
investment as if it were a prospective investment. Retain
those that fit your financial goals and have good potential. Consider
selling any that won’t meet your financial goals or that you
don’t have the expertise to manage.
• Evaluate the costs
before selling. For tax purposes, the inherited investment’s
tax basis is stepped up to market value on the date of death. Thus,
selling inherited assets soon after receiving them typically won’t
result in large capital gains taxes. However, review the transaction
costs for both selling the existing investment and reinvesting in
a new one. Some investments may also have a deferred sales charge.
• Your asset allocation
percentages may change drastically when you add the inherited portfolio
to your existing investments. Decide whether to move back
to your original allocation immediately or gradually over a couple
of years.
• Don’t keep inherited
investments for sentimental reasons. Selling those investments
doesn’t mean that you’re questioning the investment
capabilities of the person who gave you the assets. You just have
different financial goals than that individual.
Copyright © 2002. These articles
intend to offer factual and up-to-date information on the subjects
discussed, but should not be regarded as a complete analysis of
these subjects. The appropriate professional advisers should be
consulted before implementing any options presented. No party assumes
liability for any loss or damage resulting from errors or omissions
or reliance on or use of this material.
|